<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1422 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310902</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was systemic non-compliance with bail conditions resulting in a disproportionately large population of undertrial prisoners remaining incarcerated. The SC, on reviewing State-wise data, found the problem pronounced in multiple jurisdictions and required targeted remedial measures; counsel for certain HCs assured the Court that special steps would be taken, and the matter was flagged for immediate attention, with continuing oversight implied. A further issue was failure of representation and participation by one HC despite compliance reports; treating this as serious institutional non-responsiveness, the SC directed the Registrar of that HC to remain personally present in Court due to lack of attendance and even arrangements for representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1422 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310902</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was systemic non-compliance with bail conditions resulting in a disproportionately large population of undertrial prisoners remaining incarcerated. The SC, on reviewing State-wise data, found the problem pronounced in multiple jurisdictions and required targeted remedial measures; counsel for certain HCs assured the Court that special steps would be taken, and the matter was flagged for immediate attention, with continuing oversight implied. A further issue was failure of representation and participation by one HC despite compliance reports; treating this as serious institutional non-responsiveness, the SC directed the Registrar of that HC to remain personally present in Court due to lack of attendance and even arrangements for representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>