https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445940 A refiling delay may be condoned where the record shows sufficient cause, including change of counsel, continued pursuit by new counsel, and time spent curing registry defects, and the delay is not deliberate or wilful. An order that only defers hearing and does not decide the claim on merits does not amount to a review or modification of a concluded adjudication. A later direction to the liquidator to examine the claim with reference to the liquidation regulations is therefore permissible and does not call for interference. en-us Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445940 A refiling delay may be condoned where the record shows sufficient cause, including change of counsel, continued pursuit by new counsel, and time spent curing registry defects, and the delay is not deliberate or wilful. An order that only defers hearing and does not decide the claim on merits does not amount to a review or modification of a concluded adjudication. A later direction to the liquidator to examine the claim with reference to the liquidation regulations is therefore permissible and does not call for interference. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445940