<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 830 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445939</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging initiation of CIRP against corporate debtor. The operational creditor had supplied tire cord fabric worth Rs. 10.18 crore during 2018-2019 through 44 invoices which remained unpaid. Corporate debtor failed to reply to demand notice served under section 8(1) and admitted the debt via email dated 03.06.2020, also providing a failed payment plan. NCLAT found no pre-existing dispute existed and corporate debtor failed to present its case despite opportunities. The adjudicating authority properly analyzed facts under the Code provisions before ordering CIRP initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 830 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445939</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging initiation of CIRP against corporate debtor. The operational creditor had supplied tire cord fabric worth Rs. 10.18 crore during 2018-2019 through 44 invoices which remained unpaid. Corporate debtor failed to reply to demand notice served under section 8(1) and admitted the debt via email dated 03.06.2020, also providing a failed payment plan. NCLAT found no pre-existing dispute existed and corporate debtor failed to present its case despite opportunities. The adjudicating authority properly analyzed facts under the Code provisions before ordering CIRP initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>