<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 828 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445937</link>
    <description>The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an application for condonation of 46-day delay in filing an appeal. The appellant cited consultation with counsel and internal management regarding the impugned order as reasons for delay beyond the prescribed 30-day period plus 15-day extension. The tribunal held that consultation with counsel and internal management were within the appellant&#039;s control and did not constitute sufficient cause for delay. The excuse was deemed unbelievable and inadequate, failing to satisfy the requirement for plausible justification needed for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 828 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445937</link>
      <description>The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an application for condonation of 46-day delay in filing an appeal. The appellant cited consultation with counsel and internal management regarding the impugned order as reasons for delay beyond the prescribed 30-day period plus 15-day extension. The tribunal held that consultation with counsel and internal management were within the appellant&#039;s control and did not constitute sufficient cause for delay. The excuse was deemed unbelievable and inadequate, failing to satisfy the requirement for plausible justification needed for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>