<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1461 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310870</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA complaint was granted because the complaint had already been filed, co-accused had received similar relief, and the Court found no material apprehension that the applicant would abscond, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses. Noting that the trial was likely to take time and expressing no view on the merits, the Court held the request fit for protection against arrest, subject to furnishing the required bond, surety, and conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1461 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310870</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA complaint was granted because the complaint had already been filed, co-accused had received similar relief, and the Court found no material apprehension that the applicant would abscond, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses. Noting that the trial was likely to take time and expressing no view on the merits, the Court held the request fit for protection against arrest, subject to furnishing the required bond, surety, and conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>