https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310859 Rights under an ijara to cultivate through tenants, recover rent and other exactions, and hold land for a fixed term were treated as rights in relation to an estate under Article 31A. The Gujarat High Court held that the Act abolishing ijaras, resuming ijara lands, extinguishing the ijardar's rights, and providing compensation operated as acquisition or extinguishment of estate rights, so the challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 31 was barred. The Court also held that the measure was not invalid for want of public purpose, discrimination, or inadequate compensation, and that the petitioner had not proved butta or occupancy rights to resist the notice. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:16:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310859 Rights under an ijara to cultivate through tenants, recover rent and other exactions, and hold land for a fixed term were treated as rights in relation to an estate under Article 31A. The Gujarat High Court held that the Act abolishing ijaras, resuming ijara lands, extinguishing the ijardar's rights, and providing compensation operated as acquisition or extinguishment of estate rights, so the challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 31 was barred. The Court also held that the measure was not invalid for want of public purpose, discrimination, or inadequate compensation, and that the petitioner had not proved butta or occupancy rights to resist the notice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310859