<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 137 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34643</link>
    <description>Computer software training in UNIX, LINUX, AIX and networking was treated as training or coaching rather than Consulting Engineer Service for the period before 1-7-2003. The analysis notes that the factual record showed computer training activity, while the tax authorities relied mainly on a circular without testing the activity against the statutory definition. Because such training was brought into the tax net separately only from 1-7-2003 as Commercial Training or Coaching Service, it could not be retrospectively classified as engineering consultancy. The demand for service tax, interest and penalty was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 137 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34643</link>
      <description>Computer software training in UNIX, LINUX, AIX and networking was treated as training or coaching rather than Consulting Engineer Service for the period before 1-7-2003. The analysis notes that the factual record showed computer training activity, while the tax authorities relied mainly on a circular without testing the activity against the statutory definition. Because such training was brought into the tax net separately only from 1-7-2003 as Commercial Training or Coaching Service, it could not be retrospectively classified as engineering consultancy. The demand for service tax, interest and penalty was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>