https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445922 Penalty for transporting goods without an e-way bill was held unsustainable for the relevant period under the U.P. GST regime, because earlier Division Bench rulings had already treated the e-way bill requirement as unenforceable during that time. As the statutory requirement could not be enforced for the period in question, the consequent seizure and penalty action also failed. The impugned orders were quashed and relief was granted to the petitioner. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445922 Penalty for transporting goods without an e-way bill was held unsustainable for the relevant period under the U.P. GST regime, because earlier Division Bench rulings had already treated the e-way bill requirement as unenforceable during that time. As the statutory requirement could not be enforced for the period in question, the consequent seizure and penalty action also failed. The impugned orders were quashed and relief was granted to the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445922