<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 136 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the denial of credit on Service Tax paid for services like Insurance Premium, repair of vehicles, AMC charges on telecom, and courier charges. The decision was based on a broad interpretation of &#039;input service&#039; in line with legislative intent and previous Tribunal judgments, affirming that the services were indeed related to the manufacturing of final products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 136 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the denial of credit on Service Tax paid for services like Insurance Premium, repair of vehicles, AMC charges on telecom, and courier charges. The decision was based on a broad interpretation of &#039;input service&#039; in line with legislative intent and previous Tribunal judgments, affirming that the services were indeed related to the manufacturing of final products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>