<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34641</link>
    <description>In tyre retreading treated as a works contract, the separately identified value of materials sold in the course of providing the service was not includible in the service tax base when VAT had been paid on those materials. The Tribunal applied the principle that a service tax valuation cannot include the value of goods transferred as part of the transaction where the material component is separately shown in the invoice and taxed as goods. It also held that Notification No. 12/2003-ST extends to goods and materials sold by the service provider to the recipient, so the material portion was deductible from the gross taxable value and the exemption was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34641</link>
      <description>In tyre retreading treated as a works contract, the separately identified value of materials sold in the course of providing the service was not includible in the service tax base when VAT had been paid on those materials. The Tribunal applied the principle that a service tax valuation cannot include the value of goods transferred as part of the transaction where the material component is separately shown in the invoice and taxed as goods. It also held that Notification No. 12/2003-ST extends to goods and materials sold by the service provider to the recipient, so the material portion was deductible from the gross taxable value and the exemption was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>