<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 796 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445905</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that DRP directions issued without mentioning DIN in the order body are invalid and non-est. The tribunal ruled that subsequent separate communication of DIN cannot cure this defect, as statutory mandate requires computer-generated DIN to be quoted in communication body from October 1, 2019. Following judicial precedents including Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd case, assessment orders based on such defective DRP directions were declared void and deemed never issued. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 796 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445905</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that DRP directions issued without mentioning DIN in the order body are invalid and non-est. The tribunal ruled that subsequent separate communication of DIN cannot cure this defect, as statutory mandate requires computer-generated DIN to be quoted in communication body from October 1, 2019. Following judicial precedents including Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd case, assessment orders based on such defective DRP directions were declared void and deemed never issued. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>