<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 794 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445903</link>
    <description>The ITAT PUNE-AT quashed a revision proceeding under section 263 initiated by the PCIT regarding taxability of government grants. The tribunal held that the PCIT failed to independently examine the assessment record and instead relied solely on the AO&#039;s request for revision dated 22-03-2018. The court ruled that both conditions under section 263 - calling for and examining records, and independently determining the order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - must be cumulatively satisfied by the CIT alone. Since the PCIT exercised jurisdiction wrongfully without independent examination, the revision was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 794 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445903</link>
      <description>The ITAT PUNE-AT quashed a revision proceeding under section 263 initiated by the PCIT regarding taxability of government grants. The tribunal held that the PCIT failed to independently examine the assessment record and instead relied solely on the AO&#039;s request for revision dated 22-03-2018. The court ruled that both conditions under section 263 - calling for and examining records, and independently determining the order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - must be cumulatively satisfied by the CIT alone. Since the PCIT exercised jurisdiction wrongfully without independent examination, the revision was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>