<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eligibility for Immunity from Penalty Confirmed Despite Payment Delay u/s 271AAA Settlement Order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73156</link>
    <description>Loss of immunity from Penalty u/s. 271AAA - Delay in payment full tax as per the order of Settlement Commission (ITSC) - DR in argument mentioned that the assessee had lost the immunity, so penalty is justified. But remained silent about the application of Section 271AAA(2)(i) - In our considered view, the assessee is eligible for granting immunity for application of penalty u/s 271AAA - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:11:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eligibility for Immunity from Penalty Confirmed Despite Payment Delay u/s 271AAA Settlement Order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73156</link>
      <description>Loss of immunity from Penalty u/s. 271AAA - Delay in payment full tax as per the order of Settlement Commission (ITSC) - DR in argument mentioned that the assessee had lost the immunity, so penalty is justified. But remained silent about the application of Section 271AAA(2)(i) - In our considered view, the assessee is eligible for granting immunity for application of penalty u/s 271AAA - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:11:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>