<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 782 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445891</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench upheld maintainability of joint Section 7 application against three separate corporate entities involved in a common real estate project. The tribunal held that all three companies were intrinsically interwoven with the project, making joint application permissible as resolution would be impossible without all entities. Regarding threshold requirements, NCLAT followed SC precedent in Manish Kumar, ruling that Rs. 1 crore default need not exist against each applicant individually - collective default suffices. The tribunal clarified that limitation periods for some applicants being expired does not affect maintainability if overall default exceeds threshold and is within limitation. Appeal dismissed, confirming Section 7 application&#039;s maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 782 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445891</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench upheld maintainability of joint Section 7 application against three separate corporate entities involved in a common real estate project. The tribunal held that all three companies were intrinsically interwoven with the project, making joint application permissible as resolution would be impossible without all entities. Regarding threshold requirements, NCLAT followed SC precedent in Manish Kumar, ruling that Rs. 1 crore default need not exist against each applicant individually - collective default suffices. The tribunal clarified that limitation periods for some applicants being expired does not affect maintainability if overall default exceeds threshold and is within limitation. Appeal dismissed, confirming Section 7 application&#039;s maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>