https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445889 Recovery of pseudoephedrine, being a controlled substance, did not attract the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The alleged Ketamine Hydrochloride recovery also could not justify denial of bail because the prosecution had not established a recovery attributable to the applicant through chemical analysis or other reliable foundational evidence, and invoices alone were insufficient to presume contraband possession. The applicant's prolonged custody, limited trial progress, and parity with co-accused who had obtained bail further supported release. Section 37 was therefore treated as inapplicable on the facts, and bail was granted. en-us Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445889 Recovery of pseudoephedrine, being a controlled substance, did not attract the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The alleged Ketamine Hydrochloride recovery also could not justify denial of bail because the prosecution had not established a recovery attributable to the applicant through chemical analysis or other reliable foundational evidence, and invoices alone were insufficient to presume contraband possession. The applicant's prolonged custody, limited trial progress, and parity with co-accused who had obtained bail further supported release. Section 37 was therefore treated as inapplicable on the facts, and bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445889