<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 64 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, upholding service tax demands with interest, setting aside the penalty under Section 77, reducing the penalty under Section 76 to Rs. 100 per day in one appeal, and reducing the penalty under Section 78 to 25% of the service tax demand in both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 64 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, upholding service tax demands with interest, setting aside the penalty under Section 77, reducing the penalty under Section 76 to Rs. 100 per day in one appeal, and reducing the penalty under Section 78 to 25% of the service tax demand in both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>