<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34636</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the disallowance of CENVAT credit on security services, leading to the revenue&#039;s present appeals. The case focused on the correct interpretation of the definition of &quot;input service,&quot; with the judgment emphasizing that security services provided in a place unconnected with the business activities of the manufacturer do not qualify as an &quot;input service.&quot; The penalties imposed on the assessee were set aside, concluding that penalties should not be imposed in such circumstances, and the orders of adjudication were restored save for the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34636</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the disallowance of CENVAT credit on security services, leading to the revenue&#039;s present appeals. The case focused on the correct interpretation of the definition of &quot;input service,&quot; with the judgment emphasizing that security services provided in a place unconnected with the business activities of the manufacturer do not qualify as an &quot;input service.&quot; The penalties imposed on the assessee were set aside, concluding that penalties should not be imposed in such circumstances, and the orders of adjudication were restored save for the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>