<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 62 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34635</link>
    <description>The appellate authority confirmed the demand and interest but modified penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority under sections 73, 75, 76, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties by the Commissioner under section 80, considering the assessee&#039;s compliance and lack of fraudulent intent. The revenue&#039;s appeal for higher penalties was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision as appropriate based on the circumstances and the assessee&#039;s conduct during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 62 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34635</link>
      <description>The appellate authority confirmed the demand and interest but modified penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority under sections 73, 75, 76, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties by the Commissioner under section 80, considering the assessee&#039;s compliance and lack of fraudulent intent. The revenue&#039;s appeal for higher penalties was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision as appropriate based on the circumstances and the assessee&#039;s conduct during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>