https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310830 The AAR Mumbai deferred ruling on classification of Echo family devices (Echo 4th Gen., Echo Dot 4th Gen., Echo Dot with Clock, Echo Studio) under tariff headings 85176290 or 8518. The authority noted conflicting advance rulings between Mumbai and Delhi AARs on similar devices, with appeals already pending before Delhi HC. Citing judicial propriety principles from Titanor Components and subsequent CESTAT decisions, the AAR held it improper to create further discordance on sub-judice matters. The ruling was postponed pending Delhi HC's decision on Amazon's appeals, except for one non-Echo wireless speaker device which would be decided separately. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:35:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310830 The AAR Mumbai deferred ruling on classification of Echo family devices (Echo 4th Gen., Echo Dot 4th Gen., Echo Dot with Clock, Echo Studio) under tariff headings 85176290 or 8518. The authority noted conflicting advance rulings between Mumbai and Delhi AARs on similar devices, with appeals already pending before Delhi HC. Citing judicial propriety principles from Titanor Components and subsequent CESTAT decisions, the AAR held it improper to create further discordance on sub-judice matters. The ruling was postponed pending Delhi HC's decision on Amazon's appeals, except for one non-Echo wireless speaker device which would be decided separately. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310830