https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310829 The Bombay HC issued an order setting a returnable date for the rule on December 4, 2017, and interim relief on October 4, 2017. Notices were accepted by the Union of India and the State Government. The 3rd respondent, State of Maharashtra through its Secretary (Finance), required separate service. Hamdast and private service were permitted alongside court service. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:35:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310829 The Bombay HC issued an order setting a returnable date for the rule on December 4, 2017, and interim relief on October 4, 2017. Notices were accepted by the Union of India and the State Government. The 3rd respondent, State of Maharashtra through its Secretary (Finance), required separate service. Hamdast and private service were permitted alongside court service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310829