https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445886 A writ challenge to 18% GST stipulated in tender conditions for collection rights over human hair was rejected because the petitioner had ated with full knowledge of the term, accepted the bid conditions, and continued collections without objection. The Court treated the dispute as contractual in nature and found no basis for interference under Article 226 where the petitioner sought to resile from an agreed condition. The claim for exemption under Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) also failed, as the respondent maintained that the arrangement was for collection rights rather than an outright sale, weakening the exemption plea. The GST demand and exemption challenge were therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445886 A writ challenge to 18% GST stipulated in tender conditions for collection rights over human hair was rejected because the petitioner had ated with full knowledge of the term, accepted the bid conditions, and continued collections without objection. The Court treated the dispute as contractual in nature and found no basis for interference under Article 226 where the petitioner sought to resile from an agreed condition. The claim for exemption under Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) also failed, as the respondent maintained that the arrangement was for collection rights rather than an outright sale, weakening the exemption plea. The GST demand and exemption challenge were therefore rejected. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445886