<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445873</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by agreeing to treat the impugned assessment order dated 20.04.2021 as a draft assessment order. This allowed the petitioner to file objections within the statutory period of 30 days. The court vacated the interim order dated 19.05.2021, which was made absolute on 10.01.2023, and directed the parties to proceed based on the digitally signed order. References to the initiation of penalty proceedings were removed, providing the petitioner a clear path to challenge the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445873</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by agreeing to treat the impugned assessment order dated 20.04.2021 as a draft assessment order. This allowed the petitioner to file objections within the statutory period of 30 days. The court vacated the interim order dated 19.05.2021, which was made absolute on 10.01.2023, and directed the parties to proceed based on the digitally signed order. References to the initiation of penalty proceedings were removed, providing the petitioner a clear path to challenge the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>