<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 746 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445855</link>
    <description>Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act was introduced by the 2018 amendment and was treated as prospective in operation. Because the complaint had been filed before the amendment came into force, the court held that the power to direct interim compensation could be exercised only in complaints arising after the amendment. The order requiring deposit of interim compensation in the present complaint was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 746 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445855</link>
      <description>Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act was introduced by the 2018 amendment and was treated as prospective in operation. Because the complaint had been filed before the amendment came into force, the court held that the power to direct interim compensation could be exercised only in complaints arising after the amendment. The order requiring deposit of interim compensation in the present complaint was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>