https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445854 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC was not used to quash Section 138 NI Act proceedings where the complaint concerned dishonour of seven cheques. The Court held that whether the cheques arose from one transaction or separate transactions was a disputed factual issue that could not be conclusively decided at the threshold. The applicability of Section 219 CrPC was treated as a matter for trial, and the accused was left free to raise the defence before the trial court. The challenge to the cognizance order and revisional order therefore failed, and quashing was declined. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:32:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445854 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC was not used to quash Section 138 NI Act proceedings where the complaint concerned dishonour of seven cheques. The Court held that whether the cheques arose from one transaction or separate transactions was a disputed factual issue that could not be conclusively decided at the threshold. The applicability of Section 219 CrPC was treated as a matter for trial, and the accused was left free to raise the defence before the trial court. The challenge to the cognizance order and revisional order therefore failed, and quashing was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445854