<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 34 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34626</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, involved a dispute over service tax demand, interest, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant did not contest the tax demand but sought a waiver of penalties citing a clerical error. The Member (Technical) found no intention to evade tax, reducing the penalty under section 78 and setting aside the penalty under section 77. The appeal upheld the tax demand and interest, set aside the penalty under section 77, and reduced the penalty under section 78 to 25% of the original amount imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 34 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34626</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, involved a dispute over service tax demand, interest, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant did not contest the tax demand but sought a waiver of penalties citing a clerical error. The Member (Technical) found no intention to evade tax, reducing the penalty under section 78 and setting aside the penalty under section 77. The appeal upheld the tax demand and interest, set aside the penalty under section 77, and reduced the penalty under section 78 to 25% of the original amount imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>