<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1381 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310825</link>
    <description>Subsidy received from a telecom company on sale of mobile handsets was examined to determine whether it formed consideration for business auxiliary services. The Tribunal noted that the issue was identical to an earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own group matter and that the Revenue ed the present dispute was covered by that ruling. Applying that binding precedent on identical facts, the subsidy was held not to constitute taxable consideration for business auxiliary services and was therefore not liable to service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1381 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310825</link>
      <description>Subsidy received from a telecom company on sale of mobile handsets was examined to determine whether it formed consideration for business auxiliary services. The Tribunal noted that the issue was identical to an earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own group matter and that the Revenue ed the present dispute was covered by that ruling. Applying that binding precedent on identical facts, the subsidy was held not to constitute taxable consideration for business auxiliary services and was therefore not liable to service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>