<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 738 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310823</link>
    <description>Statutory tariff notifications governed the power purchase arrangement under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, and the amended tariff notification restricted the claimed deemed generation incentive. The change-in-law clause contemplated such amendments, so contractual terms could not override the tariff regime. Recovery of excess payments remained subject to the limitation determination upheld by the lower authorities; repeated correspondence did not extend limitation without a qualifying acknowledgment. The supplementary agreement treated the specified amount as own capital and allowed interest on the deemed loan only at the agreed rate for the expressly defined period from 1 July 2003 to 31 December 2009. No interest could be implied for an earlier period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 738 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310823</link>
      <description>Statutory tariff notifications governed the power purchase arrangement under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, and the amended tariff notification restricted the claimed deemed generation incentive. The change-in-law clause contemplated such amendments, so contractual terms could not override the tariff regime. Recovery of excess payments remained subject to the limitation determination upheld by the lower authorities; repeated correspondence did not extend limitation without a qualifying acknowledgment. The supplementary agreement treated the specified amount as own capital and allowed interest on the deemed loan only at the agreed rate for the expressly defined period from 1 July 2003 to 31 December 2009. No interest could be implied for an earlier period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>