<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1427 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310822</link>
    <description>SC dismissed appellant&#039;s challenge to DMRC&#039;s contract award for 486 Standard Gauge Cars to respondent company. HC had earlier found no illegality in bid evaluation process. Appellant contended DMRC should have validated GEC values for achievability, but SC held no such requirement existed in tender terms. Court found DMRC&#039;s evaluation proper, noting successful bidder&#039;s GEC values were acceptable and loading calculations correct. Administrative review committee&#039;s post-judgment report deemed inappropriate as it subjected judicial determination to administrative scrutiny without hearing affected party. Appeal dismissed with costs of Rs. 5,00,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1427 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310822</link>
      <description>SC dismissed appellant&#039;s challenge to DMRC&#039;s contract award for 486 Standard Gauge Cars to respondent company. HC had earlier found no illegality in bid evaluation process. Appellant contended DMRC should have validated GEC values for achievability, but SC held no such requirement existed in tender terms. Court found DMRC&#039;s evaluation proper, noting successful bidder&#039;s GEC values were acceptable and loading calculations correct. Administrative review committee&#039;s post-judgment report deemed inappropriate as it subjected judicial determination to administrative scrutiny without hearing affected party. Appeal dismissed with costs of Rs. 5,00,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>