<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 653 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445762</link>
    <description>The HC directed the Official Liquidator to de-seal the property in question within 30 days, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s rightful ownership. The court instructed the Official Liquidator to retrieve all relevant documents and equipment from the premises and hand over the vacant property to the petitioner. The Income Tax Department was found to have no role in the de-sealing process. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 653 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445762</link>
      <description>The HC directed the Official Liquidator to de-seal the property in question within 30 days, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s rightful ownership. The court instructed the Official Liquidator to retrieve all relevant documents and equipment from the premises and hand over the vacant property to the petitioner. The Income Tax Department was found to have no role in the de-sealing process. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>