<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 642 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against the CIT(A) order for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. For 2008-09, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO due to the non-deduction of tax under section 194C, as the relationship between the assessee and its members was not that of contractor-subcontractor. The same reasoning applied to the appeals for 2009-10 and 2010-11, leading to their dismissal. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s order across all years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 642 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against the CIT(A) order for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. For 2008-09, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO due to the non-deduction of tax under section 194C, as the relationship between the assessee and its members was not that of contractor-subcontractor. The same reasoning applied to the appeals for 2009-10 and 2010-11, leading to their dismissal. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s order across all years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>