<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 626 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445735</link>
    <description>The Customs department&#039;s dues were clarified to fall for payment under the statutory waterfall in Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, rather than outside the insolvency distribution framework. The Court noted that limitation required consideration, but it did not undertake a detailed adjudication or remand; instead, it disposed of the appeal with the clarification that the claim must be dealt with in accordance with the insolvency waterfall mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 626 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445735</link>
      <description>The Customs department&#039;s dues were clarified to fall for payment under the statutory waterfall in Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, rather than outside the insolvency distribution framework. The Court noted that limitation required consideration, but it did not undertake a detailed adjudication or remand; instead, it disposed of the appeal with the clarification that the claim must be dealt with in accordance with the insolvency waterfall mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>