<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 609 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445718</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding valuation of goods sold between related parties. The tribunal held that parties were interconnected undertakings under Section 4(3)(b)(i) of Central Excise Act but not related persons under sub-clauses (ii), (iii), or (iv). Revenue failed to establish mutuality of interest or other prescribed relationships beyond interconnected undertaking status. Show cause notice only alleged relationships under sub-clauses (i) and (iv), making revenue&#039;s arguments regarding other sub-clauses beyond scope. Transaction value between parties was upheld as correct valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 609 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445718</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding valuation of goods sold between related parties. The tribunal held that parties were interconnected undertakings under Section 4(3)(b)(i) of Central Excise Act but not related persons under sub-clauses (ii), (iii), or (iv). Revenue failed to establish mutuality of interest or other prescribed relationships beyond interconnected undertaking status. Show cause notice only alleged relationships under sub-clauses (i) and (iv), making revenue&#039;s arguments regarding other sub-clauses beyond scope. Transaction value between parties was upheld as correct valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>