https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445715 Where a Civil Court order is appealable under the Code of Civil Procedure, resort to Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily inappropriate and the party should be relegated to the statutory appeal. The text also notes that a Receiver order affecting secured properties should not proceed without impleading the mortgagee bank, particularly where proceedings under the SARFAESI Act already exist. Material suppression and failure to hear a necessary party justified keeping the Receiver order in abeyance, directing fresh consideration, and preserving the status quo that existed before the impugned civil court order. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445715 Where a Civil Court order is appealable under the Code of Civil Procedure, resort to Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily inappropriate and the party should be relegated to the statutory appeal. The text also notes that a Receiver order affecting secured properties should not proceed without impleading the mortgagee bank, particularly where proceedings under the SARFAESI Act already exist. Material suppression and failure to hear a necessary party justified keeping the Receiver order in abeyance, directing fresh consideration, and preserving the status quo that existed before the impugned civil court order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445715