<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445713</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s rectification application and pass orders in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed, and the respondents were required to complete that consideration within six weeks. The decision is confined to the procedural obligation to examine the rectification request and issue a lawful order, without stating any substantive finding on the merits of the rectification claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:11:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445713</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s rectification application and pass orders in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed, and the respondents were required to complete that consideration within six weeks. The decision is confined to the procedural obligation to examine the rectification request and issue a lawful order, without stating any substantive finding on the merits of the rectification claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>