<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2130 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310800</link>
    <description>Cash payment for purchase of land was held to fall within the Rule 6DD exception because the seller had no bank account when the transaction was completed, the consideration was recorded in the registered sale deed, and the payment was made to meet business exigency. On those facts, disallowance under section 40A(3) could not be sustained and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2130 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310800</link>
      <description>Cash payment for purchase of land was held to fall within the Rule 6DD exception because the seller had no bank account when the transaction was completed, the consideration was recorded in the registered sale deed, and the payment was made to meet business exigency. On those facts, disallowance under section 40A(3) could not be sustained and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>