<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310804</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding deduction of interest on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNCDs). The tribunal held that the assessee had adequately explained the nature of PNCDs during assessment proceedings, citing relevant provisions of Companies Act and SEBI regulations. The Revenue&#039;s contention that perpetual debentures were akin to equity was rejected as the assessee had repaid the bonds with interest and notified stock exchanges as per SEBI requirements, proving these were genuine borrowings. Since the borrowings were used for business purposes, interest deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310804</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding deduction of interest on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNCDs). The tribunal held that the assessee had adequately explained the nature of PNCDs during assessment proceedings, citing relevant provisions of Companies Act and SEBI regulations. The Revenue&#039;s contention that perpetual debentures were akin to equity was rejected as the assessee had repaid the bonds with interest and notified stock exchanges as per SEBI requirements, proving these were genuine borrowings. Since the borrowings were used for business purposes, interest deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>