https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310794 A compromise decree creating a licensor-licensee relationship remained a revocable licence, because the absence of a fixed term or express termination clause did not make it irrevocable; the surrounding terms preserved the owner's possession and control. The person using the premises on permissive terms, with keys kept at reception and payment on a daily tariff basis, was not in settled possession and had only a right of use, not legal possession. Once the licence was revoked, protection by injunction was unavailable, and the occupant's remedy was limited to a reasonable time to vacate under the Indian Easements Act, 1882. en-us Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:13:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310794 A compromise decree creating a licensor-licensee relationship remained a revocable licence, because the absence of a fixed term or express termination clause did not make it irrevocable; the surrounding terms preserved the owner's possession and control. The person using the premises on permissive terms, with keys kept at reception and payment on a daily tariff basis, was not in settled possession and had only a right of use, not legal possession. Once the licence was revoked, protection by injunction was unavailable, and the occupant's remedy was limited to a reasonable time to vacate under the Indian Easements Act, 1882. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310794