<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 609 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310792</link>
    <description>Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is meant to refer parties to arbitration when a judicial proceeding is brought despite an arbitration agreement, not to restrain the commencement or continuation of arbitral proceedings. An application seeking to block arbitration could not properly be treated as one under Section 8 for the purpose of granting an injunction against arbitral proceedings. The lower courts proceeded on a ? avoid non-English. The impugned order was held unsustainable and was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the civil court to consider the application afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 609 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310792</link>
      <description>Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is meant to refer parties to arbitration when a judicial proceeding is brought despite an arbitration agreement, not to restrain the commencement or continuation of arbitral proceedings. An application seeking to block arbitration could not properly be treated as one under Section 8 for the purpose of granting an injunction against arbitral proceedings. The lower courts proceeded on a ? avoid non-English. The impugned order was held unsustainable and was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the civil court to consider the application afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>