https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310793 A contract may be terminated by mutual consent under Section 62 of the Contract Act, and a later agreement that expressly records consensual dissolution will generally govern the parties' relationship. Here, the supplemental agreement stated that the franchise arrangement would continue only up to a fixed date, after which the original contract would end. The plaintiff's challenges based on unconscionability, unequal bargaining power, duress, coercion, want of consideration, and illegality were not supported by sufficient material at the interim stage, especially where the plaintiff had negotiated, accepted, and acted on the supplemental terms without timely protest. Interim injunctions were therefore refused because relief could not be granted to continue the earlier arrangement contrary to the binding supplemental agreement. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:14:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310793 A contract may be terminated by mutual consent under Section 62 of the Contract Act, and a later agreement that expressly records consensual dissolution will generally govern the parties' relationship. Here, the supplemental agreement stated that the franchise arrangement would continue only up to a fixed date, after which the original contract would end. The plaintiff's challenges based on unconscionability, unequal bargaining power, duress, coercion, want of consideration, and illegality were not supported by sufficient material at the interim stage, especially where the plaintiff had negotiated, accepted, and acted on the supplemental terms without timely protest. Interim injunctions were therefore refused because relief could not be granted to continue the earlier arrangement contrary to the binding supplemental agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310793