<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445697</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI upheld CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The TPO&#039;s action to charge mark-up on third party costs was partially rejected. Advertisement, publicity, and trade event expenses were treated as pass-through costs without mark-up since they were undertaken at overseas entity&#039;s request with budget controlled by associated enterprise and risks borne by them. However, other expenses remained part of cost base requiring mark-up. Regarding foreign exchange losses, ITAT held these should be excluded from profit level indicator computation as they are operational/financial charges in nature, consistent with treatment of comparable companies in benchmarking analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445697</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI upheld CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The TPO&#039;s action to charge mark-up on third party costs was partially rejected. Advertisement, publicity, and trade event expenses were treated as pass-through costs without mark-up since they were undertaken at overseas entity&#039;s request with budget controlled by associated enterprise and risks borne by them. However, other expenses remained part of cost base requiring mark-up. Regarding foreign exchange losses, ITAT held these should be excluded from profit level indicator computation as they are operational/financial charges in nature, consistent with treatment of comparable companies in benchmarking analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>