<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 564 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445673</link>
    <description>Where a company is in liquidation, Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 requires the liquidator, successor-in-interest or other authorised legal representative to apply for continuance of the appeal within the prescribed time. In the absence of any such application by the liquidator, the appeal abates automatically by operation of the rule. The Tribunal therefore treated the proceedings as terminated and did not adjudicate the tax demand on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 564 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445673</link>
      <description>Where a company is in liquidation, Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 requires the liquidator, successor-in-interest or other authorised legal representative to apply for continuance of the appeal within the prescribed time. In the absence of any such application by the liquidator, the appeal abates automatically by operation of the rule. The Tribunal therefore treated the proceedings as terminated and did not adjudicate the tax demand on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>