<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 27 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34591</link>
    <description>HC upheld the validity of the notice issued under s.148 for reassessment, holding that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure of material facts. Although books of account, audit report, balance sheet and other documents were produced in the original assessment under s.143(3), a specific amount was not credited in the profit and loss account and was not properly brought to the AO&#039;s notice. HC held that mere production of books does not satisfy the duty of disclosure under s.147 Explanation 1. The reassessment proceedings were therefore valid and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 27 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34591</link>
      <description>HC upheld the validity of the notice issued under s.148 for reassessment, holding that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure of material facts. Although books of account, audit report, balance sheet and other documents were produced in the original assessment under s.143(3), a specific amount was not credited in the profit and loss account and was not properly brought to the AO&#039;s notice. HC held that mere production of books does not satisfy the duty of disclosure under s.147 Explanation 1. The reassessment proceedings were therefore valid and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>