https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310776 The court held that the appellant's delay of approximately 2.5 years in performing the contracts was unreasonable, allowing the plaintiffs to treat the contracts as revoked and rescinded. The contracts were deemed unenforceable due to material differences, uncertainty, and lack of mutuality in the terms. The plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of their deposits with interest at six percent per annum as damages. The appeals were dismissed with costs, affirming the judgment and decree of the lower court. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:37:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310776 The court held that the appellant's delay of approximately 2.5 years in performing the contracts was unreasonable, allowing the plaintiffs to treat the contracts as revoked and rescinded. The contracts were deemed unenforceable due to material differences, uncertainty, and lack of mutuality in the terms. The plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of their deposits with interest at six percent per annum as damages. The appeals were dismissed with costs, affirming the judgment and decree of the lower court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310776