<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310774</link>
    <description>Pecuniary loss in a fatal accident claim should be assessed by the multiplier method, taking the deceased&#039;s net contribution to the family after deducting personal living expenses and capitalising it by an appropriate multiplier. That approach is the established method for securing uniformity, certainty and just compensation, and departure from it is justified only in rare and exceptional cases. Future prospects may be reflected in the income assessment, but the compensation awarded on the basis used by the High Court was inconsistent with settled principles. The award was therefore reduced, while interest was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310774</link>
      <description>Pecuniary loss in a fatal accident claim should be assessed by the multiplier method, taking the deceased&#039;s net contribution to the family after deducting personal living expenses and capitalising it by an appropriate multiplier. That approach is the established method for securing uniformity, certainty and just compensation, and departure from it is justified only in rare and exceptional cases. Future prospects may be reflected in the income assessment, but the compensation awarded on the basis used by the High Court was inconsistent with settled principles. The award was therefore reduced, while interest was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>