<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 548 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445657</link>
    <description>HC dismissed contractor&#039;s writ petition seeking GST tax reimbursement from government. Court ruled that determining contract tax entitlement involves disputed factual interpretations beyond Article 226 jurisdiction. Contractor advised to seek remedy through civil court proceedings for resolving tax reimbursement dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 548 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445657</link>
      <description>HC dismissed contractor&#039;s writ petition seeking GST tax reimbursement from government. Court ruled that determining contract tax entitlement involves disputed factual interpretations beyond Article 226 jurisdiction. Contractor advised to seek remedy through civil court proceedings for resolving tax reimbursement dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>