<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 540 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445649</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding deemed rent on unsold flats held as stock-in-trade. PCIT contended that annual letting value of unsold inventory should be taxed as deemed rent under section 23(1)(a). However, ITAT held that AO properly investigated the matter following CBDT circular guidelines. Relying on SC precedent in Chennai Properties Investments Ltd. vs CIT, tribunal ruled that unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be assessed under business income head, not as deemed rent under property income. PCIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 was deemed unsustainable. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 540 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445649</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding deemed rent on unsold flats held as stock-in-trade. PCIT contended that annual letting value of unsold inventory should be taxed as deemed rent under section 23(1)(a). However, ITAT held that AO properly investigated the matter following CBDT circular guidelines. Relying on SC precedent in Chennai Properties Investments Ltd. vs CIT, tribunal ruled that unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be assessed under business income head, not as deemed rent under property income. PCIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 was deemed unsustainable. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>