<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 539 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445648</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging reopening of assessment under section 147 and addition under section 50C. The assessee sold two immovable properties in equal co-ownership but claimed exemption based on distance from municipal limits. The tribunal found the properties were only 2.5-3 kilometers from Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation&#039;s outer limit, not beyond 8 kilometers as claimed. Despite a certificate from Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam supporting the assessee&#039;s position, the tribunal rejected it as contrary to facts established during remand proceedings. The CIT(A)&#039;s direction to recompute capital gains by reducing acquisition costs from total sale consideration was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 539 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445648</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging reopening of assessment under section 147 and addition under section 50C. The assessee sold two immovable properties in equal co-ownership but claimed exemption based on distance from municipal limits. The tribunal found the properties were only 2.5-3 kilometers from Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation&#039;s outer limit, not beyond 8 kilometers as claimed. Despite a certificate from Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam supporting the assessee&#039;s position, the tribunal rejected it as contrary to facts established during remand proceedings. The CIT(A)&#039;s direction to recompute capital gains by reducing acquisition costs from total sale consideration was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>