<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445646</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that Form 35-A must be verified by the assessee personally, not by an advocate or authorized representative. The DRP&#039;s dismissal of objections filed with advocate verification violated natural justice principles by not providing opportunity to cure the defect. The tribunal remanded the matter, directing the assessee to refile objections before DRP within 30 days with proper verification in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445646</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that Form 35-A must be verified by the assessee personally, not by an advocate or authorized representative. The DRP&#039;s dismissal of objections filed with advocate verification violated natural justice principles by not providing opportunity to cure the defect. The tribunal remanded the matter, directing the assessee to refile objections before DRP within 30 days with proper verification in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>