<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445644</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding profits on sale of flats. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs. 10,32,70,436/- relating to additional construction costs for Towers I-V, finding the claimed cost of Rs. 3,438/- per sq.ft. reasonable compared to rates communicated by the contractor. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing land acquisition costs at Rs. 260 based on valuation reports, rejecting revenue&#039;s contention that land was vacant under ULC regulations. Interest on HDFC Bank loans for settling employee dues was allowed as development cost since it facilitated providing clear marketable title to the developer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445644</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding profits on sale of flats. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs. 10,32,70,436/- relating to additional construction costs for Towers I-V, finding the claimed cost of Rs. 3,438/- per sq.ft. reasonable compared to rates communicated by the contractor. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing land acquisition costs at Rs. 260 based on valuation reports, rejecting revenue&#039;s contention that land was vacant under ULC regulations. Interest on HDFC Bank loans for settling employee dues was allowed as development cost since it facilitated providing clear marketable title to the developer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>