<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34585</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with concrete evidence, especially in cases involving deductions under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee failed to establish the manufacturing activity as claimed, leading to the denial of the benefit under Section 80IA. The lack of evidence supporting the manufacturing process and sales transactions, coupled with the rejection of presented documents, resulted in the unfavorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34585</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with concrete evidence, especially in cases involving deductions under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee failed to establish the manufacturing activity as claimed, leading to the denial of the benefit under Section 80IA. The lack of evidence supporting the manufacturing process and sales transactions, coupled with the rejection of presented documents, resulted in the unfavorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>